Legal Opinion

Warmack v. Zingg

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellant instituted this suit to partition an oil and gas lease on land described in the complaint and for an accounting on certain royalty interests from oil produced and sold by the appellee, ft. M. Zingg.

The defendant filed answer, denying all the material allegations in plaintiff’s complaint, except as to the royalty interests of appellant, and admitted that the defendant was due appellant $61.80. The court entered a decree finding in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant as to the royalty interests for $61.80 and costs, and dismissed the complaint for want of equity, in so…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bank of Dermott v. MeaselSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Jones v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. PopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Winfrey v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Burke Construction Co. v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 20Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Banks v. Corning Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API