Hill v. Day
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.
Appellee, Earl Day, filed this action asking that an instrument which appears on its face to be a deed be declared an equitable mortgage, and that under his alleged contract of purchase with the mortgagor he be allowed to redeem from the mortgagee. The issues are whether the deed is in fact an equitable mortgage and if so whether Day has the right to redeem. Mary Brown owned 432 acres in Clay County; her son, Neal, owned 80 acres. They borrowed money from a gin company and as security gave a deed to all the property, retaining.an option to repurchase. They were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Collins v. HeitmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Clark v. ReyburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Valley Planing Mill Company v. Lena Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Clark-Mcwilliams Coal Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Ehrlich v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fales v. GlassMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Duvall v. Laws, Swain & Murdoch, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Ruth v. LitesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
- In Re ReichenbachUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.