Lubbers v. Flagstar Bancorp. Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is presently before the Court on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint [docket entry 19]. Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition and defendants have filed a reply. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2), the Court shall decide this motion without a hearing. For the following reasons, the Court shall grant defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I. Background
Plaintiff brings this federal securities class action against Flagstar…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re TransDigm Group, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File No. 1:17 CV 1677District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020