Legal Opinion

Finney v. Guy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Pierce county: E. W. Helms, Circuit Judge. Suit by the receiver of a Minnesota corporation, appointed by one of the courts of that state, to recover the additional stockholder’s liability under the laws and constitution of Minnesota. The complaint was before this court and considered on demurrer in Fvnney v. Guy, 106 Wis. 256, wherein it was decided that the complaint did not state a cause of action.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Pierce county: E. W. Helms, Circuit Judge. Suit by the receiver of a Minnesota corporation, appointed by one of the courts of that state, to recover the additional stockholder’s liability under the laws and constitution of Minnesota. The complaint was before this court and considered on demurrer in Fvnney v. Guy, 106 Wis. 256, wherein it was decided that the complaint did not state a cause of action. The former order of the circuit court overruling demurrer thereto was reversed, and cause remanded “for further proceedings according to law.” Upon…

1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.

The respondent presented and argued a motion to strike certain papers out of the record sent up from the court below, but we feel obliged to decline considera*298tion, for the reason that, such motion, and a notice that the same would be made, having been served on the appellants on the 15th day of August, 1901, the respondent, on the T7th day of August, served a notice that “the annexed notice of motion to dismiss the appeal in this action heretofore served on you on August 15th, ,a copy of which is hereto-annexed, is hereby withdrawn.” Annexed to that notice were copies of the notice and motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Great Western Telegraph Co. v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Wollman v. RuehleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Finney v. GuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Patten Paper Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Priewe v. Wisconsin State Land & Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strehlau v. John Schroeder Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Howard v. HowardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State ex rel. Kurath v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Euting v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hooper v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API