Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kurath v. Ludwig

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mamdamus to J. O. Ludwig, Judge of the Circuit Court for Milwaukee county.

1Opinion of the CourtVistje, J.

This is an action of mandamus commenced in this court to compel the Honorable J. C. Ludwig, as judge of Branch Ho. 4 of the circuit court for Milwaukee county, to reverse an order granting a new trial in the case of Kurath *386v. Gove Automobile Co., reported in 144 Wis. 480, 129 N. W. 619; to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff upon the special verdict; to expunge from the records of the circuit court the entry of March 4, 1910, which reads as follows: “The motion for a new trial was continued, to^ be taken under advisement by the court, and that the order be entered thereon as of April 2,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Steinhofel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Second National Bank of Richmond v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Mitchell v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Dufresne v. WeiseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kurath v. Gove Automobile Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Potrykus v. SchinzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Schenck v. Sterling Engineering & Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API