Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1924No. 8481PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— Manufacturing intoxicating liquor is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in .the penitentiary for a period of three years.

The point made against the indictment was decided in favor of the State in Ex Parte Gilmore, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 529.

The refusal of the court to permit the appellant to interrogate, on their voir dire, the members of the venire who served on the jury touching their relations with the Ku Klux Klan was error. See Reich v. State, 94 Texas Crim. Rep., 449; Benson v. State, 95 Texas Crim, Rep., 311; and authorities cited; also Meador v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GilmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Reich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Belcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Sessions v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Meador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Prather v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Rayburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Tyler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API