Legal Opinion

Reich v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1923No. 7277PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.

The indictment contained no averments to the effect that the intoxicating liquor was not manufactured for one of the purposes permitted by the Constitution and statutes. It was filed in March, 1922. The date of the offense was laid on the 10th of November, 1921, and “anterior to the presentment of the. indictment.”' The attack on it because of the absence of the negative averments is deemed unsound. Such averments were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Crow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. De Arman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Plair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Burkett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API