Legal Opinion
Governors Grove Condominium Ass'n v. Hill Development Corp.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 28, 1980No. File 27614PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiffs are a nonstock corporation which is a condominium association (hereinafter referred to as the association) and two individual condominium owners acting for themselves and for the class of past and present condominium unit owners. The right of the plaintiffs to represent all the class members was determined in an earlier decision in the case. Governors Grove Condominium Assn. v. Hill Development Corporation, 35 Conn. Sup. 199. The defendants are Hill Development Corporation and LaCava Construction Company (hereinafter referred to as Hill and LaCava). The plaintiffs’ amended…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Berman v. GurwiczNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Appeal of ArmaganianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Biro v. HirschConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- PORT LIBERTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC., INC. v. Sordoni Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.