Legal Opinion
Appeal of Armaganian
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 13, 2001No. 98-710PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C. J.
The petitioners, Troopers Mark Armaganian and Theodore Korontjis (troopers), appeal a decision of the personnel appeals board (PAB). The troopers challenge both the PAB’s conclusion that they conspired to obtain an unauthorized witness fee for Trooper Armaganian and the PAB’s decision to uphold the sanction of major discipline for each trooper. We reverse.
The following facts are not in dispute. Armaganian was scheduled to appear in Hampton District Court to prosecute a speeding case on the morning of January 19,1995. Because he was off-duty on January 19,1995, Armaganian hoped to find another…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jay Edwards, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- In re Estate of ButtrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Governors Grove Condominium Ass'n v. Hill Development Corp.Connecticut Superior Court · 1980
- State v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Appeal of BoulaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In re HustonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Appeal of WatermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Appeal of New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.