Browder v. Aetna Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
"To prevail on motion for summary judgment, the movant has the burden to produce evidence which conclusively eliminates all material issues in the case.” Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Forsyth, 122 Ga. App. 463, 464 (177 SE2d 505). And, although the general rule is that upon the trial of the case the testimony of a party litigant, where self-contradictory or ambivalent, must be construed against him, yet on motion for summary judgment made by a party upon whom the burden of proof does not lie on the trial of the case, all evidence must be construed against the movant and in favor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Cable Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Corbin v. Gulf Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Hoover v. Maxum Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Columbia Drug Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Jacore Systems, Inc. v. Central Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Benton Bros. Ford Co. v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.