Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 9, 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

These are three motions for summary judgment made by the United States in three suits brought against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 1 These cases, although each presents a separate and distinct controversy, are considered together in a single opinion because they involve the same defendant making the same motion in suits under the same statute. Two of these cases concern military personnel killed in an automobile and airplane respectively, and raise in common the question of whether their deaths were “incident to the service.” These will be considered together…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Freddie L. Johnson and Clara Johnson, Husband and Wife, and Cross v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Timothy B. Hay, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Arnold Panella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Meléndez v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
  4. Moos v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  5. Camassar v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API