Legal Opinion

Balla v. Gambro, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1991No. 70942PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The issue in this case is whether in-house counsel should be allowed the remedy of an action for retaliatory discharge.

Appellee, Roger Balla, formerly in-house counsel for Gambro, Inc. (Gambro), filed a retaliatory discharge action against Gambro, its affiliate Gambro Dialysatoren, KG (Gambro Germany), its parent company Gambro Lundia, AB (Gambro Sweden), and the president of Gambro in the circuit court of Cook County (Gambro, Gambro Germany and Gambro Sweden collectively referred to as appellants). Appellee alleged that he was fired in contravention of Illinois public policy and sought…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Van Asdale v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Crews v. Buckman Laboratories International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dowd and Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API