Legal Opinion

Lamar Advertising Co. v. Township of Elmira

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 26, 2004No. 02-10310-BCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAWSON, District Judge.

In October 2001, the plaintiff, Lamar Advertising Co., applied to Otsego County and the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) for permits to erect a billboard near a storage facility along M-32 in Elmira Township in Northern Michigan. At the time, the local law required only that Lamar apply to the MDOT for permission to erect the billboard along that state highway. The MDOT eventually approved the application that Lamar had presented to it, but…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Field Day, LLC v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City of HopkinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  3. Lamar Advertising of Michigan, Inc. v. City of UticaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  4. Lamar OCI North Corp. v. City of WalkerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011
  5. Prime-Site Media, LLC v. City of Oak ParkDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API