Carl and Janice Duffner v. City of St. Peters
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge
Introduction and Summary
Carl and Janice Duffner (Appellants) appeal the dismissal of their petition against the City of St. Peters (City). The City had sought to enforce an ordinance requiring Appellants to maintain turf grass on at least 50 percent of their residential yard areas. Appellants initially requested a variance from the City’s Board of Adjustment (Board), and after the Board granted only a partial variance, Appellants filed the present action. Section 89.110 1 provides that parties aggrieved by a board of adjustment decision are "to seek review by…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- J.C.W. Ex Rel. Webb v. WyciskallaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Janice Duffner v. City of St. Peters, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- 375 Slane Chapel Road, LLC v. Stone County, MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
- Colleen Spurlock v. City of Columbia, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Double AA Market, LLC v. City of St. Louis, MOMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- Emerald Pointe, LLC v. Taney County, MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.