Legal Opinion

Rostad v. Hirsch

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 19, 2011No. AC 31904Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

In this contested paternity action, after genetic testing established that the defendant was the father of the plaintiffs child, the trial court awarded pendente lite attorney’s fees to each member of the mother’s litigation team. The father’s appeal contests the amount of the fees awarded to the mother’s attorneys. We must decide whether we have jurisdiction to hear this interlocutory appeal and whether the record supports the court’s fee awards. We decide both of these questions in the father’s favor. Accordingly, we reverse the court’s rulings as to two of the mother’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Paranteau v. DeVitaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Litvaitis v. LitvaitisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API