Legal Opinion
Crites v. Photometric Products Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided October 13, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
A preliminary matter needs first to be noticed. The petitioner makes mention in its petition of the point that the final decree was not served upon it as required by Rule 107 of this court. That rule is as follows:
“Rule 107. A copy of any order, rule or decree made by the Chancellor upon a party not appearing in the cause by a solicitor, shall be served on such party by the Sheriff, unless otherwise ordered by the Chancellor, and the order, rule or decree shall take effect only from the time of such service.”
What is meant to be made of that point is not disclosed on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cox v. LynnIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Camden v. FerrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. GittingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- Drawdy Investment Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cohen v. Brandywine Raceway AssociationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
- Commonwealth v. DuestMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Brady v. BeamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- R. H. McWilliams, Jr., Co. v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937