Legal Opinion

Chen v. U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1993No. 92-56582Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

9 F.3d 1553

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Ting CHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; Charles

Ming, Manager; Mary Chambers; John Gutierrez;

Dale Holmes; Ray Brewer, Chief Property

Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-56582.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 20, 1993.*

Decided Oct. 29, 1993.

Before: BEEZER,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Gregory Carey v. John E. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Hiram Ash v. Eugene CvetkovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Harlan L. Jacobsen v. Richard FillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API