Legal Opinion

Solitron Devices, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 3, 1989No. 88-5522PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in its Final Order of Summary Judgment entered on March 31, 1988 and appended hereto.

APPENDIX

FINAL ORDER OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARCUS, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE has come before the Court upon the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Defendant raises two bases for summary judgment: the limited jurisdiction of a district court over a matter that has been before the Tax Court under 26 U.S.C. § 6512(a) and res judicata. For the reasons set forth below, we GRANT the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. Facts

The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Emma R. Dorl v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Elbert v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Estate of Bailly v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tilley v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  2. Owen A. Moran and Jean B. Moran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. David A. Koss Freya B. Koss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Ishler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Solitron Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API