Legal Opinion

Kidwell v. Transportation Communications International Union

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 27, 1990No. Civ. PN-85-3804PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIEMEYER, District Judge.

The four plaintiffs, who are or have been railroad employees and who purport to represent others similarly situated, have sued the Transportation Communications International Union and two of its locals (collectively “the TCU” or “the Union”), complaining about the Union’s expenditure of dues for purposes unrelated to collective bargaining and its method of reducing dues to nonunion employees. The TCU is the collective bargaining representative under an agency shop relationship authorized by the Railway Labor Act, which permits railroad employees to be union…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dean v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Kenneth Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Labor OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  3. Dashiell v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Dashiell v. Montgomery County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Nielsen v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 2569Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API