Legal Opinion

Miller v. City Bank & Trust Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1978No. Docket 77-2611PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C. J.

After a nonjury trial based on stipulated facts, the trial court found that plaintiff had failed to carry her burden of proof in establishing the existence of a partnership between herself and her late husband. On appeal, plaintiff claims that the trial court’s decision was clearly erroneous. We affirm.

In 1959, plaintiff met Philip Miller. Later, Mr. Miller asked plaintiff to marry him, to move to Jackson and to help him run his nursery business. They were married in Baltimore, and plaintiff gave up her well-paying job to move to Jackson. Although Mr. Miller had been operating the business…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Lobato v. PaulinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Moore v. DubardMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Arnsteen v. U. S. Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Lipsig v. RamlawiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. First Public Corp. v. ParfetMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Herman Drainage Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
  5. Brown v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API