Legal Opinion

In Re Hood

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1993No. 68,311PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is a family law first-impression case concerning a claim of visitation rights by an unrelated third party. Dianne Hofmann appeals the dismissal of her petition to allow visitation with a four-year-old minor, Senator J. Christopher Hood. Dianne asserts standing under the grandparent visitation statute, K.S.A. 38-129. She also advocates the creation of a common-law right of visitation for third parties when two conditions are met: (1) Visitation is in the child’s best interests, and (2) there has been a substantial relationship between the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Blevins v. Board of Douglas County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Collins v. GilbreathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Roberts v. WardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Board of Education v. NEA-GoodlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bellamy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Frazier v. GoudschaalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Titchenal v. DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Sowers v. TsamoliasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. In the Interest of C.T.G.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API