Legal Opinion
Stadnisky v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 8, 2007No. A06A2497PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
Walter Stadnisky was accused of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) to the extent it was less safe for him to drive, driving with an unlawful alcohol concentration, OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (5), and failure to maintain lane. After a stipulated bench trial, Stadnisky was found guilty of the per se DUI charge and of failure to maintain lane; the less safe DUI charge was nolle prossed. Stadnisky appeals. Finding that none of his enumerations of error has merit, we affirm.
1. Stadnisky challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his DUI conviction, asserting that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- State v. FolkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Morrissette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Rackoff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Krepps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- State v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.