Legal Opinion

State v. Preston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 2008No. A08A0183PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Kevin Preston was a driver in an automobile accident that involved a fatality. He was indicted on several charges, including driving under the influence, and he moved to suppress the results of a state-administered blood test. The trial court granted the motion. We find this ruling was in error and reverse.

Under the implied consent statute, 1 a person operating a motor vehicle is deemed to have consented to a chemical test for the presence of alcohol or drugs if he or she has been involved in a traffic accident involving a serious injury or fatality, and if the investigating…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Hough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. State v. TousleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. State v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. State v. Jack HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API