State v. Preston
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
Kevin Preston was a driver in an automobile accident that involved a fatality. He was indicted on several charges, including driving under the influence, and he moved to suppress the results of a state-administered blood test. The trial court granted the motion. We find this ruling was in error and reverse.
Under the implied consent statute, 1 a person operating a motor vehicle is deemed to have consented to a chemical test for the presence of alcohol or drugs if he or she has been involved in a traffic accident involving a serious injury or fatality, and if the investigating…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Hough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- State v. TousleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- State v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- State v. Jack HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.