Steelcase, Inc. v. Delwood Furniture Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALYIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
A chair manufacturer who deliberately copied the highly successful chair being marketed by a competitor justifies his actions on the basis that the patents for the chair he copied were invalid. National policy encourages competition on the theory that the battle of the marketplace benefits consumers. Because every patent creates a monopoly, Congress has balanced the encouragement of inventions with its devotion to competition,1 and exacted standards for patent validity that deny patent protection even to some successful and innovative ideas. Thus, patentability…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- A. B. Baumstimler v. Bueford B. Rankin, Kenneth J. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Lester L. Smith, and Cross-Appellee v. Acme General Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Radio Steel & Mfg. Co. v. MTD Products Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- Colortronic Reinhard & Co., K.G. v. Plastic Controls, Inc., Colortronic Reinhard & Co., K.G. v. Plastic Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.