Legal Opinion

Muir v. Chatfield

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 7, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. In the matter of the petition of James Thomson Muir, master of the British Admiralty transport Gleneden, for writs of prohibition and mandamus against Thomas I. Chatfield, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

This is an original proceeding in this court for a writ of prohibition and a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Thomas Ives Chatfield, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, on the ground that he has wrongfully refused to release from arrest in a proceeding in rem for collision the British Admiralty transport Gleneden in a libel there pending. We quote from the brief on behalf of the British Embassy in support of the petition, as follows:

“An admiralty suit in rem was brought in the Eastern District of New York by an Italian…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Ex Parte EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Whitney v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. v. MolyneauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  2. Schendel v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. United States v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. Wabash Ry. Co. v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. In re GilboughCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API