Legal Opinion

Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. v. Molyneaux

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1934No. 381PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus or (alternatively) of prohibition against Judge Molyneaux, of the District of Minnesota. The basis of the application is that a disqualifying affidavit was filed by petitioners against the Judge in Wirt Wilson & Company v. Minnesota and Ontario Paper Company, pending before him, and that the judge erroneously held such insufficient and is proceeding to exercise jurisdiction therein.

In limine, we are met by a challenge from respondent of the jurisdiction of this court to entertain the application. The jurisdiction of federal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Ex Parte YergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In the Matter of United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, MovantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  2. William J. Green, Jr. v. Honorable John W. Murphy, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Herman Dubnoff v. Honorable David J. Goldstein, Referee in Bankruptcy in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. Pfizer Inc. v. LordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API