Legal Opinion

State v. Manzanares

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1996No. 23267PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Justice.

1. The State appealed to the Court of Appeals from the district court’s dismissal of criminal proceedings against Ventura Manzanares for violation of his right to a speedy trial. The district court had concluded that because almost eleven months passed since the indictment of Manzanares, his right to a speedy trial was presumptively violated. The Court of Appeals deemed the appeal to present a significant question of law under the New Mexico Constitution, namely whether this Court’s grant of an extension of time for trial beyond the six-month limit of SCRA 1986, 5-604…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Salandre v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. LaneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. HeinsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. PlouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API