In re Toaston

CRICHTON, J.,

additionally concurs and assigns reasons:1

hi wholeheartedly agree. with the Court’s decision to permanently disbar the Respondent Randal Alandre Toaston in this matter, preventing him from engaging in the practice of law in Louisiana ever again. Although “[o]ur jurisprudence has made it clear we do not impose permanent disbarihent lightly,’- I find this respondent’s litany of unethical and egregious misconduct appalling and abusive. This Court has emphasized that “[pjermanent disbarment is reserved for those cases where the attorney’s conduct convincingly demonstrates that he or…