Legal Opinion
In re Mitchell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 7, 2014No. 2013-B-2688PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
2Per curiam
|! This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, David J. Mitchell, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.
*308UNDERLYING FACTS
From 1978 to 2008, respondent was an associate, then a partner, in the New Orleans office of the law firm of Porteous, Hainkel, Johnson & Sai’py (“the firm”), where his practice was principally confined to the defense of insurance companies. Given the nature of his practice, respondent billed for his legal work on an hourly basis, and these bills were…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re: Adam Anthony AbdallaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- In re Committee on Bar Admissions CFN-1578Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
- In re ToastonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017