Legal Opinion

Nicholls v. Kammerich

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1981No. WD32006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASSERSTROM, Judge.

Plaintiff John W. Nicholls sued to recover money paid by him toward the purchase of land and cattle. Defendants Andy Kamme-rich and his wife claimed offset for damages flowing from Nicholls’ default. The jury found for defendants, and Nicholls appeals. We affirm.

On May 2, 1970, the parties entered into an informal agreement under which Nic-holls was to acquire from Kammerich approximately 160 head of cattle and from Kammerich and wife a 569 acre farm on which those cattle were located. The agreement called for a purchase price of $80,000 on the land, of which $10,000 was to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoene v. Associated Dry Goods CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Doyle Ex Rel. Doyle v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Continental Insurance v. BeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Stroh v. JohnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Fowler v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BrightmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Cedar Point Apartments, Ltd. v. Cedar Point Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Andrew JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. J.A. Tobin Construction Co. v. State Highway Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State of Missouri v. Dustin Demont BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API