Legal Opinion

Custom Rail Employer Welfare Trust Fund v. Geeslin

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2007No. 06-50106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to interpret a particular provision of ERISA 1 for the first time. In doing so, we focus on the statutory requirement that the instant employee welfare benefit plan must be “fully insured” in order for certain state regulation to be preempted by federal law. The Custom Rail Employer Welfare Trust Fund (“CREW”) asserts that it is a “fully-insured” multiple employer welfare arrangement (“MEWA”) and accordingly brought this injunctive and declaratory action against the Texas Commissioner of Insurance (“the Commissioner”) to require the state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Fuesting v. Lafayette Parish Bayou Vermilion DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rolando Serna v. Law Office of Joseph Onwuteaka, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Archer v. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2007
  3. Stoffels Ex Rel. SBC Telephone Concession Plan v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
  4. Wright v. Louisiana Corrugated Products, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2014
  5. Rolando Serna v. Law Office of Joseph Onwuteaka, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API