Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 20, 1925No. 24,434PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

Since our decision of this case, the Supreme Court of the United States has filed its opinion in Modern Woodmen of America v. Mixer, 267 U.S. 544, 45 Sup. Ct. 389, 69 L. ed. 506. The question involved is such that the rule of that court is controlling. It requires a reversal of this case and in consequence, the original opinion, so far as inconsistent with that result, is withdrawn.

The by-law sustained in the Mixer case was in purpose and effect identical in nature with that involved here and was adopted after the making of the insurance contract upon which recovery was sought. The by-law had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. MixerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Boynton v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mooney v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API