Legal Opinion

Allied Store Utilities Co. v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1941No. 28644PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The proffered amendment to the petition, which was disallowed, was not ordered filed by the court as a part of the record, was not incorporated in the bill of exceptions or attached thereto as an exhibit and properly identified by the court, but was specified in the bill of exceptions as a part of the record material to an understanding of the errors complained of. “Where an amendment to a pleading is tendered and disallowed, and there is no order directing that it be filed and made a part of the record, . . it is not part of the record, and can not be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chappell v. Western RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Branan v. Baxter & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. State v. BradfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  4. Schaeffer v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Sutherland v. DonovanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Gage v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Griffin v. FIRST PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL OF GEORGIA, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Zampatti v. TRADEBANK INTERN. FRANCHISINGCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API