Legal Opinion

Borden v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1939No. 27438PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

1. Where tlie certificate to a bill of exceptions omits the words “is true and,” by reason of which omission the recitals of the bill are not certified to be true, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the exceptions. Howard v. State, 51 Ga. App. 556 (180 S. E. 905); Rountree v. Gibbs, 156 Ga. 170 (118 S. E. 654); Cady v. Cady, 161 Ga. 556 (131 S. E. 282); Hinton v. State, 31 Ga. App. 293 (120 S. E. 550); Foster v. State, 29 Ga. App. 233 (114 S. E. 582).

2. It affirmatively appears from the bill of exceptions in the instant case that the same was tendered to the trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Cady v. CadySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Cartledge v. AshfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Rountree v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Shadinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API