Legal Opinion
Moorhead MacHinery & Boiler Co. v. Del Valle
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 5, 1996No. 95CA2135PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge BRIGGS.
Petitioners, Moorhead Machinery & Boiler Company (employer), and its insurer, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, seek review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) determining that Colorado had jurisdiction over this workers’ compensation proceeding and that Daniel Del Valle (claimant) sustained a compensable mental impairment. We affirm.
Claimant was a member of the boiler makers’ union. Although no master contract was introduced into evidence, the union apparently had an agreement with various contractors, including the employer, to obtain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bowers v. American Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Denver Truck Exchange & State Compensation Insurance Fund v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Horodyskyj v. KaranianSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Hathaway Lighting, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Horodyskyj v. KaranianColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Youngquist Brothers Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Youngquist Brothers Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.