Legal Opinion
In Re Wene
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
26 N.J. Super. 363 (1953)
97 A.2d 748
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ELMER H. WENE, TO CONTEST UNDER R.S. 19:29-2 THE NOMINATION OF ROBERT B. MEYNER.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 29, 1953.
Messrs. Charles A. Stanziale, James T. Kirk, and Francis M. McInerney, attorneys for contestant Elmer H. Wene.
Messrs. Milton B. Conford, Joseph Weintraub, and Gerald T. Foley, attorneys for incumbent Robert B. Meyner.
JOSEPH L. SMITH, J.S.C.
On May 14, 1953 a petition, hereinafter referred to as complaint, in the above entitled cause, was filed pursuant to chapter 29 of Title 19 of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kilmurray v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Sharrock v. KeansburgNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Hopper v. StackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- In Re CleeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- In re Contest of the Election of RayNew Jersey Circuit Court · 1947
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re 1984 General ElectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- In Re MooreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Beaudoin v. Belmar Tavern Owners Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Curtis v. BindemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970