Legal Opinion
Holder v. Holder
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1959No. 8984PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice.
Richard H. Holder sued Ruth R. Holder for annulment of marriage on the ground that she fraudulently induced him to enter it by representing that she was pregnant with his child. Defendant counterclaimed for divorce, alimony, support money for the infant child born August 13, 1957, and for other relief. The trial court found for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
Richard Holder, then 19 years of age, and Ruth who- was 17 years of age and a junior in high school, had been “keeping company” and admit to acts of sexual intercourse for some time prior to May, 1956, when the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Dazey v. DazeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State in Interest of JWFUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Lopes v. LopesUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Lanford v. LanfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Pearson v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Roods v. RoodsUtah Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.