Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Pearson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2008No. 20060563PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 Petitioner Pete Thanos ("Thanos") filed a motion to intervene in the divorce proceedings of petitioner Kimberlee Pearson ("Kim-berlee") and respondent Kelly Pearson ("Kelly") in order to challenge the paternity of the Pearsons' son Z.P. The district court granted the motion, but the Utah Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that Thanos lacked standing based on our decision in In re J.W.E. (Schoolcraft).1

12 We granted certiorari on three questions. First, whether the court of appeals erred in its interpretation and application of the Schoolcraft analysis set…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. HutchisonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State in Interest of JWFUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wilson v. Family Services Division, Region TwoUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Lopes v. LopesUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Holder v. HolderUtah Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Madsen v. Washington Mutual Bank FSBUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. R.P. v. K.S.W.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. ChetteroUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. GreenwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API