Legal Opinion

Protective Life Ins. Co. v. Linson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 29, 1944No. 6 Div. 228PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

“It is a well-settled rule that a beneficiary in a life insurance policy who murders or feloniously causes the death of the insured forfeits all rights which he may have in or under the policy. This rule is based upon public policy and upon the principle that no one shall be allowed to benefit from his own wrong. * * *.”■ 29 Am.Jur. § 1310.

“It would be a reproach to the jurisprudence of the country if one could recover insurance money payable on the death of the party whose life he had feloniously taken. As well might he recover insurance money upon a building that he had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Slocum v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Schmidt v. Northern Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Smith v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Weaver v. HollisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Garner v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. American Life Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Chute v. Old American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API