Legal Opinion
Ghazi v. Fiserv, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 17, 1997No. 95 C 0258PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
The defendants, Fiserv, Inc. (“Fiserv”) and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (“UNUM”), move for summary judgment on the complaint filed by the plaintiffs, Syed I. Ghazi1 and his wife, Syeda Ghazi. For the reasons stated above, the defendants’ motion is denied.
I2
Mr. Ghazi was employed by Fiserv as a computer operator. While so employed, Mr. Ghazi was entitled to certain “fringe” benefits, issued to Fiserv by UNUM. Specifically, Fiserv and UNUM provided a group life insurance policy, whose coverage discontinued when the insured was no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bernice F. Stark v. Caspar W. Weinberger (Successor to Elliot Richardson)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Bernita Hammond v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Clark Ray Helms and Betty Helms v. Monsanto Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Harvey Jackson Torix v. Ball Corporation, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Cury v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughes v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- Brian Caraba v. Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
- Caraba, D.D.S. v. Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Tiffany Scorzo v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026