Edsil Trading Corp. v. John Minder & Sons, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
This motion made by the defendant for summary judgment under rule-113 of the Rules of Civil Practice is granted. Plaintiff, in the course of trade and not for its own consumption, purchased certain produce from the defendant and now seeks recovery of the amount paid therefor in excess of Office of Price Administration maximum prices. Two causes of action are stated, one for money had and received, and the second for breach of certain warranties made with reference to the produce so purchased. There can be no recovery on the fir'st cause of action (Marrow Mfg. Co. v. Eitinger, 185 Misc. 900,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carmine v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Marrow Manufacturing Corporation v. EitingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Marrow Manufacturing Corp. v. EitingerNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Marrow Manufacturing Corp. v. EitingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. BlindmanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Edsil Trading Corp. v. John Minder & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947