Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Veasey

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 4, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this workmen’s compensation case, the determinative question is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Industrial Accident Board’s finding of “unusual exertion” and permanent disability.

I

The claimant’s work involved unloading “basics”, a unit used to move parts to the assembly line. The basic had two boards, approximately 6 feet by 2 feet in size, on which the parts were secured; both the boards and the parts were removed together. With the aid of a partner, it was the claimant’s job to replace the empty boards on the basic. When a partner was not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. Gray's Hatchery & Poultry Farms, Inc. v. StevensSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. Faline v. Guido and Francis DeAscanis & SonsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  5. Reynolds v. Continental Can CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DiSabatino Bros., Inc. v. WortmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Duvall v. Charles Connell RoofingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. Turbitt v. Blue Hen Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  4. Simmons v. Delaware State HospitalSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. Boulevard Electric Sales v. WebbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API