General Motors Corp. v. Veasey
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
In this workmen’s compensation case, the determinative question is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Industrial Accident Board’s finding of “unusual exertion” and permanent disability.
I
The claimant’s work involved unloading “basics”, a unit used to move parts to the assembly line. The basic had two boards, approximately 6 feet by 2 feet in size, on which the parts were secured; both the boards and the parts were removed together. With the aid of a partner, it was the claimant’s job to replace the empty boards on the basic. When a partner was not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Gray's Hatchery & Poultry Farms, Inc. v. StevensSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
- Faline v. Guido and Francis DeAscanis & SonsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
- Reynolds v. Continental Can CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DiSabatino Bros., Inc. v. WortmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Duvall v. Charles Connell RoofingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Turbitt v. Blue Hen Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Simmons v. Delaware State HospitalSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Boulevard Electric Sales v. WebbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.