Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. One Pontiac 8 Sedan

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1937No. Civ. 10474PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, Acting P. J.

This proceeding was brought to obtain an order of forfeiture of a certain automobile under the provisions of the State Narcotic Act. (Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 5323.) Richard McAfee, the registered owner, and Anglo California National Bank, the legal owner, appeared and answered. After a trial by the court, findings were made in favor of plaintiff and from the judgment ordering the forfeiture, the Anglo California National Bank has appealed.

The automobile was purchased by McAfee on a conditional sales contract from Hoppert & Bergesen. Said contract was thereafter assigned to said bank. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. One Harley-Davidson MotorcycleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. One Ford V8 Tudor SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. People v. One Lincoln Eight, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Herlihy v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Lady v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. One 1938 Buick SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. People v. One 1949 Ford Tudor SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. People v. One 1937 Packard 6 Touring SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. One La Salle Four Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Hernandez v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API