Legal Opinion
People v. One La Salle Four Door Sedan
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1937No. Civ. No. 10485PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
Pursuant to section 15 (b) of the Narcotic Act (Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 5323), appellant filed and served, upon its owners, notice of seizure and intended forfeiture of the above-described automobile, which it claimed had been used for the unlawful transportation of narcotics. The owner of the automobile defaulted. As permitted by the section, respondent, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, answered, asserting that it was the legal owner of the automobile by reason of the seller’s assignment to it of the contract by which the automobile had been conditionally sold to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. One Pontiac 8 SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. One 1938 Buick SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. One 1936 Pontiac Six Four Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938