Legal Opinion

Lady v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1937No. Civ. 11255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after a trial before a court without a jury.

Appellant has failed in his opening brief to present each point separately under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented and the point to be made. (Sec. 2, rule VIII, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California.)

Mr. Presiding Justice Conrey in Adams v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co., 124 Cal. App. 393 [12 Pac. (2d) 464], in commenting upon this provision of rule VIII, supra, accurately states the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Opdyk v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Richmond Redevelopment Agency v. Western Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. One Pontiac 8 SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API