Legal Opinion

Corrado v. Wolf

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

Petitioner in this article 78 proceeding seeks an order directing the Building Inspector of the Town of Oyster Bay to issue a building permit. Although the permit was denied because the application “ does not conform to Art. VI Sec. D-3, ” respondent acknowledges the basis of its denial was not any deficiency in area (petitioner had, indeed, obtained a variance) but that petitioner had failed to provide 11 the required certificate of approval from the New York State Department of Public Works.” The only “ requirement ” to which reference is made is set forth in the Instructions For Preparing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Headley v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Lido Links Homes, Inc. v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Froehlich v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Aster Agency, Inc. v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colonial Estates, Inc. v. StancoNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Winepol v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API