Legal Opinion

Winepol v. Town of Hempstead

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

Petitioners seek an order in the nature of mandamus requiring the town Building Inspector to issue three building permits. The properties in question lie within an area which the town seeks to acquire by condemnation for use as a swimming pool. The facts are not in dispute. The Building Inspector denied the permits “ on the grounds that we are in the process of condemning this property.” In so doing, he acted wholly without authority and, therefore, arbitrarily. It follows that petitioners are entitled to the judgment they demand.

The town does not deny that petitioners can make no use of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corrado v. WolfNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindner v. Incorporated Village of FreeportNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Jensen v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API