Legal Opinion

Skolnik v. Mansolillo

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 16, 2003No. 2002-49-AppealPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This case comes before us on the appeal of the defendants, City of Providence, by and through City Treasurer Stephen T. Napolitano, and Charles R. Mansolillo (Mansolillo), individually and in his capacity as city solicitor for the City of Providence (city or defendants). They appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court granting the plaintiff, Richard A. Skolnik (Skolnik or plaintiff), attorney’s fees and interest for services rendered to the Employees’ Retirement System of the City of Providence (board). The defendants also appeal from the decision denying…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  2. Betz v. PaolinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  3. PROVIDENCE RETIREMENT BD. v. City Council of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. City of Providence v. Employee Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. Mansolillo v. Employee Retirement Board of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation ex rel. AnknerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API