Legal Opinion

Rinker v. Bissell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

— The complaint in this case represented that George P. Bissell, styling himself trustee, on the 1st day of April, 1883, entered into a written contract with Caleb P. Rinker, for the sale of lot No. 11 of Butler’s Subdivision of Outlot No. 180, in the city of Indianapolis, agreeing to convey said lot by a deed warranting against all such incumbrances as he might have placed on the same, in consideration of. the sum of $5,000, which Rinker was to pay on receipt of a deed for the lot. The complaint further represented that Bissell had executed and tendered to Rinker a good and sufficient deed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Musselman v. CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Thompson v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Wolcott v. StandleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lilly v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Mitchell v. St. MaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Halstead v. CoenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Meikel v. GreeneIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API