Legal Opinion

Bennett Interests, Ltd. v. Koomos

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 31, 1986No. 13-86-340-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

Appellee brought suit under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The trial court granted appellee a judgment by default, and awarded appellee with $10,000.00 in damages and $3,000.00 in attorneys’ fees. Appellants bring two points of error. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part,

Appellants, by their first point of error, complain that the trial court erred in failing to set aside the default judgment.

A default judgment is set aside and a new trial ordered when the failure of the defendant to answer before judgment was not intentional, or the result of conscious…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Conrad v. Orellana, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  5. Bertsch & Co., Inc. v. Spells, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pentes Design, Inc. v. Perez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  2. Willacy County Appraisal Review Board v. South Padre Land Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  3. Daylin, Inc. v. Juarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
  4. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API